REMULLA VS. MALIKSI Case Digest

REMULLA VS. MALIKSI 

G.R. NO. 171633 

DOCTRINE: Jurisprudence dictates that a taxpayer may be allowed to sue where there is a claim that public funds are illegally disbursed or that public money is being deflected to any improper purpose, or that public funds are wasted through the enforcement of an invalid or unconstitutional law or ordinance. ART. 7 paragraph 3 Administrative or executive acts, orders and regulations shall be valid only when they are not contrary to laws or the Constitution. 

COCA-COLA FEMSA PH VS. BSFUIO-ALU Case Digest

COCA-COLA FEMSA PH VS. BACOLOD SALES FORCE UNION-CONGRESS OF INDEPENDENT ORGANIZATION-ALU G.R. NO. 220605 

DOCTRINE: Courts should not shirk from exercising their power to review, where under applicable laws and jurisprudence, such power may be rightfully exercised," as in this case. ART. 9 NCC No judge or court shall decline to render judgment by reason of the silence, obscurity or insufficiency of the laws.